An Ethical Inquiry" 1. Cloning is a form of reproduction in which offspring result not from the chance union of egg and sperm sexual reproduction but from the deliberate replication of the genetic makeup of another single individual asexual reproduction. Human cloning, therefore, is the asexual production of a new human organism that is, at all stages of development, genetically virtually identical to a currently existing or previously existing human being.
Is cloning fair to cloned humans? The Catholic Leadership Conference. November 1, - "In the case of reproductive cloning the engendered child would be brought to term and delivered without the benefit of parents since it would carry the genetic code only of the one who had supplied the DNA from his or her somatic cell.
This would also constitute a violation of the rights of the child in many ways. Since there is currently no basis in common or statutory law to determine who would have responsibility for the care of the child, it would be left in a precarious position. Kilner and Robert P.
The Center for Bioethics and Dignity. Yet even with proper laws in place, it is likely that someday someone would break the laws, creating and bringing to term a cloned human, or perhaps several such persons.
It is important that we acknowledge in advance their human dignity and fundamental rights. But the likelihood of such a birth by no means suggests that this demeaning practice should remain legal. At the deepest level, cloning should be prohibited because it turns procreation into a species of manufacture.
It treats a child-to-be as an object of production. Human cloning produces individuals artificially.
As such, these individuals cannot have ordinary, God-given souls. Sadly, therefore, clones are sub-humans. Scientists want to create a race of clones to experiment on Wayne Jackson.
April 30, - "One must first raise this question? Why do scientists want to clone human beings? It certainly is not because they are anxious to generate a larger population for our planet.
They continually protest that the earth is over-crowded already. Rather, they are anxious to create a brand of humans with whom they can experiment. The most frightening idea is "growing" humans in cages, in order to "harvest" their bodies for spare parts. It is not far-fetched to imagine an unscrupulous multi-millionaire cloning himself in this manner -- in case he should ever need a kidney, heart, eye, bone marrow, etc.
December 27th, - "Such an imaginary point-of-view can help us put things in perspective. There is one argument that, as a future clone, you might understand and agree with: The argument that we ought to postpone human cloning until we have perfected the method in animals makes some degree of sense.
Even so, suppose you were a slightly deformed human clone - would you agree that it was a terrible moral offense to have caused you to come into existence?
January 1, - "But what of the souls?
Can two people share the one soul? Is it not wrong to force two personalities on to one piece of divine substance? Again, the fact that there are identical twins counts against there being a problem. Twins seem to manage, and that seems to suggest that each person is able to be ensouled regardless of their genetic make-up.
That is, assuming souls exist at all. But even if there are souls, it seems unlikely to count against cloning.But the existence of the “Taipei Six” ended debate about whether human cloning should be permitted at all, and began a more fruitful one about the circumstances in which it should be allowed.
Taiwan’s government, basking in Lao’s success, passed a law that eliminated any doubt about the . Moreover, the legislative debates over human cloning raise questions about the relationship between science and society, especially about whether society can or should exercise ethical and prudential control over biomedical technology and the conduct of biomedical research.
Whether or not popular opinion is the best stand for this controversy is addressed by attempting to answer the above questions and to conclude whether or not human reproductive cloning should be effectively banned.
That is a question we must ask ourselves? On one side of the issue are those who believe that human cloning should be permitted. One thing that shows this, is what human cloning research may bring.
Those who opposed commission to let him know within 90 days whether the new technology should be even. more tightly controlled.
. Human cloning is the creation of a human being whose genetic make-up is nearly identical 1 to that of a currently or previously existing individual. Recent developments in animal cloning coupled with advances in human embryonic stem cell research have heightened the need for legislation on this issue.
about Human Cloning and the Council's Report: "Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical especially about whether society can or should exercise ethical and prudential control over biomedical technology and the conduct of biomedical research.
Rarely has such a seemingly small innovation raised such large questions. What does U.S. law.