He is under attack constantly because he reveals the unpleasant truth that all leaders, or all governments from democracies to dictatorships are only concerned about one thing which is maintaining power. Unfortunately for Machiavelli, game theory had not been invented, so all he had to rely on was historical examples and his own observations.
Relying primarily on contemporary and historical examples, Machiavelli sets forth a detailed and comprehensive account of the attitudes, personal qualities, and methods necessary in order to rise to and maintain power. The process of rising to power brings with it a plethora of inherent difficulties that must be constantly overcome before, during, and after conquest.
In addition, it is the very set of qualities that Machiavelli himself seeks in order to overthrow the traditional paradigm. The rashness of the strong, aggressive lion must be tempered with the cunning vigilance of the physically weaker fox.
Machiavelli demonstrates both foxlike and lionesque qualities in his writing. He asserts himself as an authority and audaciously pushed his own agenda, aware but afraid of the fact that he is completely bucking the established ethos. Yet, at the same time Machiavelli is clever enough to feign sympathy with the common morality, at least to a certain extent.
His insincerity is manifest later in his book when he encourages dishonesty 40cruelty 25, 39and exploitation of religion 49 as means to acquiring power. Of course, the telos of such a man is to eventually use his Machiavellian virtue for conquest.
The Prince outlines many principles important for the conqueror to consider throughout all stages of his rise to rule. For instance, when attacking a foreign nation, Machiavelli advocates independence of effort as much as possible.
Specifically, he counsels to avoid making unnecessary alliances 14 and to utilize troops comprised only of his own people In his own intellectual assault, Machiavelli takes a similar approach by relying only on his interpretation of historical incidents and not on the opinion of other thinkers.
Another interesting method of conquest that Machiavelli both endorses for political conflict and utilizes in his own battle is the use of religion as a means of justification. He points to Ferdinand of Aragon who used the premise of religion to raise money for his army and to justify attacks on Africa Similarly, Machiavelli attempts to fortify his moral position by naming Moses, acting under the orders of God, as one of the greatest of conquerors.
Once a nation or people is conquered, there is a necessary transition period while the victor establishes himself as the rightful ruler. In this way the new ruler emerges uncontested by either former leaders or by discontented subjects.
Machiavelli makes sure to destroy the remnants of authority of the established moral and ethical leaders of his time. He also discredits, in a subtle way, the moral authority of the Catholic Church by treating it as a strictly political organization and the papacy as a self-serving dictatorship Regarding the counsel to maintain the legal status quo, Machiavelli leaves many social norms relatively untouched, despite attempts to redefine virtue and vice.
Certainly, his philosophy does not impose any new moral restrictions.
On the contrary, it is a much more permissive paradigm, not only allowing but encouraging classically deviant behavior and a means to achieve a self-serving end.
Metaphorically speaking, not only does Machiavelli avoid any new taxes, he repeals many of the accepted taxes already in place. Machiavelli holds that such a course of action may require a certain degree of harshness or cruelty, but such should not be excessive.
Rather it is based on the principle that in order to hold power, the ruler must avoid the animosity of his subjects. When it becomes necessary to act harshly, Machiavelli advises the Prince to avoid direct involvement.
Through his vivid use of specific examples, Machiavelli was able to effectively pass the proverbial buck regarding some of his more reprehensible views. As a specific example, in his treatment of cruelty vs. By appealing to the success of Borgia wrought through Machiavellian means, he was able to prove his point and at the same time remove himself from a position of responsibility.
And he was, to a large degree, successful.Essay Niccolo Machiavelli 's The Prince. Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the father of modern political theory, was the author of The Prince. A book that explains how one can acquire and maintain political power, it was even condemned by the Pope at the time it was published because it was considered a direct threat to the Catholic leslutinsduphoenix.com://leslutinsduphoenix.com The result is a deeply informed, innovative, and thoroughly republican reading of Machiavelli's notorious handbook for tyrants."--Mark Philp, Professor of History and Politics, Department of History, University of Warwick "Erica Benner's Machiavelli's Prince: A New Reading thoroughly lives up to its leslutinsduphoenix.com › Books › Politics & Social Sciences › Philosophy.
· The Prince begins with an address to Lorenzo de Medici, in which Machiavelli explains that he is seeking favor with the prince by offering him some of his knowledge. He then proceeds to classify the various kinds of states: republics, hereditary princedoms, leslutinsduphoenix.com Pris: kr.
Häftad, Skickas inom vardagar. Köp Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince av Tim Phillips på leslutinsduphoenix.com://leslutinsduphoenix.com From his perspective in Renaissance Italy, Machiavelli's aim in this classic work was to resolve conflict with the ruling prince, Lorenzo de Medici.
Machiavelli based his insights on the way people really are rather than an ideal of how they should be. This is the world's leslutinsduphoenix.com Analysis of Machiavelli´s The Prince Words | 2 Pages. The great philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli, having such beliefs, puts to rest man’s downfall and presents that way to preservation in his book The Prince, which produces an effective guide for political action based off of his own philosophical beliefs and history’s leslutinsduphoenix.com://leslutinsduphoenix.com